[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1IGrmY-000416-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 09:41:10 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: peterz@...radead.org
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: per bdi dirty balancing (was Re: kupdate weirdness)
> > My plan is to extract the minimal set of features from your patchset,
> > that solves the dirty balancing deadlocks and submit them as quickly
> > as possible.
>
> I had hoped to post a new version yesterday, but lets hope for today.
Would be cool.
> > After that we can look at trying to solve the more ambitious problem
> > of the slow vs. fast devices in a way that not only you can understand ;)
>
> Drad, and here I thought all that documentation in the proportions lib
> would have solved that :-(
Well, I didn't get that far, and only had a glimpse of the proportions
lib. But my hunch is that there's still lots of room for simplification.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists