| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:45:31 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>, "Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@...hat.com>,
"Muli Ben-Yehuda" <muli@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
riku.seppala@...p.net, "Andy Whitcroft" <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: Oops in 2.6.23-rc1-git9, arch/x86_64/pci/k8-bus.c::fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask()
On 8/4/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:30:41 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:50, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:10:03 -0400
> > >
> > > Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250859
> > > >
> > > > at line 74:
> > > >
> > > > muli@...29:
> > > > muli@...29: sd = bus->sysdata;
> > > > muli@...29: sd->node = node; <=====
> > > >
> > > > bus->sysdata is NULL.
> > > >
> > > > Last changed by this hunk of
> > > > "x86-64: introduce struct pci_sysdata to facilitate sharing of
> > > > ->sysdata":
> >
> > Hmm, will double check. Perhaps Muli's conversion was incomplete.
>
> hm.
>
> > > > @@ -67,7 +69,9 @@ fill_mp_bus_to_cpumask(void)
> > > > continue;
> > > > if (!node_online(node))
> > > > node = 0;
> > > > - bus->sysdata = (void *)node;
> > > > +
> > > > + sd = bus->sysdata;
> > > > + sd->node = node;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Andy keeps trotting out a patch which will probably fix this,
> >
> > What patch do you mean? I don't have anything sysdata related
> > left over.
> >
>
> "pci device ensure sysdata initialised", now at version 4.
>
>
>
> From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
>
> We have been seeing panic's on NUMA systems in pci_call_probe() in
> 2.6.19-rc1-mm1 and later. This is related to the changes introduced in the
> commit below:
>
> [x86, PCI] Switch pci_bus::sysdata from NUMA node integer to a pointer
> 0a247a58fc3e2ecfc17654301033e8b8d08df2a2
>
> In this change the sysdata has changed from directly representing a value
> (the node number in NUMA) to a pointer to a structure. However, it seems
> that we do not always initialise this sysdata before we probe the device.
>
> Prior to the changes above the node was defaulted to 'NULL' allocating the
> devices to node 0 unconditionally. This patch adds a default sysdata entry
> (pci_default_sysdata), this is then used where 'NULL' was used previously.
> pci_default_sysdata defaults the node to unknown (-1). This is a more
> accurate assignment, mirroring the value returned where no topology support
> is provided and no locality information is available.
>
> There are only two uses of this value in the affected architectures
> (x86, x86_64) and generic code:
>
> 1) in x86_64, dma_alloc_pages() looks up the node in order to
> allocate node local memory. Here if the node is invalid we
> will default to the first online node. Behaviour here should
> be unchanged.
> 2) in generic, pci_call_probe() looks up the node in order to
> restrict execution of the probe on the card local node, to
> favor node local allocation. Where this is unknown previously
> we would force execution (and thereby allocation) to node 0,
> this is arguably wrong and using -1 releases this restriction.
>
> In an ideal world we should be supplying a sysdata for the
> appropriate node where it is known. Where it is not known defaulting
> to -1 seems a better course, and would help us where node 0 is
> short of memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Andrew,
still need
x86_64-get-mp_bus_to_node-as-early-v2.patch in the -mm
it fix
diff -puN arch/i386/pci/irq.c~x86_64-get-mp_bus_to_node-as-early-v2
arch/i386/pci/irq.c
--- a/arch/i386/pci/irq.c~x86_64-get-mp_bus_to_node-as-early-v2
+++ a/arch/i386/pci/irq.c
@@ -136,10 +136,26 @@ static void __init pirq_peer_trick(void)
busmap[e->bus] = 1;
}
for(i = 1; i < 256; i++) {
+ struct pci_bus *bus = NULL;
+ struct pci_sysdata *sd;
if (!busmap[i] || pci_find_bus(0, i))
continue;
- if (pci_scan_bus(i, &pci_root_ops, NULL))
+ /* Allocate per-root-bus (not per bus) arch-specific data.
+ * TODO: leak; this memory is never freed.
+ * It's arguable whether it's worth the trouble to care.
+ */
+ sd = kzalloc(sizeof(*sd), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!sd) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: OOM, not probing PCI bus %02x\n",
+ i);
+ continue;
+ }
+ sd->node = get_mp_bus_to_node(i);
+ bus = pci_scan_bus(i, &pci_root_ops, sd);
+ if (bus)
printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Discovered primary peer
bus %02x [IRQ]\n", i);
+ else
+ kfree(sd);
}
pcibios_last_bus = -1;
}
diff -puN arch/i386/pci/legacy.c~x86_64-get-mp_bus_to_node-as-early-v2
arch/i386/pci/legacy.c
--- a/arch/i386/pci/legacy.c~x86_64-get-mp_bus_to_node-as-early-v2
+++ a/arch/i386/pci/legacy.c
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
static void __devinit pcibios_fixup_peer_bridges(void)
{
int n, devfn;
+ struct pci_bus *bus = NULL;
+ struct pci_sysdata *sd;
+ long node;
if (pcibios_last_bus <= 0 || pcibios_last_bus >= 0xff)
return;
@@ -21,12 +24,29 @@ static void __devinit pcibios_fixup_peer
u32 l;
if (pci_find_bus(0, n))
continue;
+ node = get_mp_bus_to_node(n);
for (devfn = 0; devfn < 256; devfn += 8) {
if (!raw_pci_ops->read(0, n, devfn,
PCI_VENDOR_ID, 2, &l) &&
l != 0x0000 && l != 0xffff) {
DBG("Found device at %02x:%02x
[%04x]\n", n, devfn, l);
printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Discovered peer
bus %02x\n", n);
- pci_scan_bus(n, &pci_root_ops, NULL);
+ /* Allocate per-root-bus (not per bus)
+ * arch-specific data.
+ * TODO: leak; this memory is never freed.
+ * It's arguable whether it's worth the trouble
+ * to care.
+ */
+ sd = kzalloc(sizeof(*sd), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!sd) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR
+ "PCI: OOM, not probing PCI bus %02x\n",
+ n);
+ break;
+ }
+ sd->node = node;
+ bus = pci_scan_bus(n, &pci_root_ops, sd);
+ if (!bus)
+ kfree(sd);
break;
}
}
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists