[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070804192130.GA25346@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:21:30 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de,
dgc@....com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com,
richard@....demon.co.uk, david@...g.hm
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
* Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org> wrote:
> > I actually vote for that. IMO, distros should turn -on- atime
> > updates when they know its needed.
>
> If you mean "relatime" I concur. "noatime" hurts mutt and others
> while "relatime" has no known problems, afaics.
so ... one app can keep 30,000+ apps hostage?
i use Mutt myself, on such a filesystem:
/dev/md0 on / type ext3 (rw,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr)
and i can see no problems, it notices new mails just fine.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists