[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708041247540.5037@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 12:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de,
dgc@....com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com,
richard@....demon.co.uk, david@...g.hm
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Well, we could make it the default for the kernel (possibly under a
> "fast-atime" config option), and then people can add "atime" or "noatime"
> as they wish, since mount has supported _those_ options for a long time.
Side note: while I think the fsync() behaviour is more irritating than
atime, that one is harder to fix. I think it's reasonable to have
"relatime" as a default strategy for the kernel, but I don't think it's
necessarily at all as reasonable to change a filesystem-specific ordering
constraint.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists