linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ufs: move non-layout parts of ufs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070805201107.GA820@lst.de>
Date:	Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:11:07 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: move non-layout parts of ufs_fs.h to fs/ufs/

On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 08:36:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 11:24:31PM +0400, Evgeniy Dushistov wrote:
> > Move prototypes and in-core structures to fs/ufs/ similar to what most
> > other filesystems already do.
> > 
> > I made little modifications: move also ufs debug macros and
> > mount options constants into fs/ufs/ufs.h, this stuff
> > also private for ufs.
> 
> Is there any reason to have util.h included directly?  Or to have
> it as a separate file and not a part of ufs.h, while we are at it...

I didn't want to do too many different things at once, but getting
rid of util.h sounds fine to me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/