| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:34:13 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, J?rn Engel <joern@...fs.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de, dgc@....com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com, trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com, richard@....demon.co.uk, david@...g.hm Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:01:18AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > on the journalling side this would be one transaction (not 5 milion) > and... since inodes are grouped on disk, you can even get some better > coalescing this way... > > Wonder if we could do inode-grouping smartly; eg if we HAVE to write > inode X, also write out the atime-dirty inodes in range X-Y to X+Y > (where Y is some tunable) in the same IO.. We already have filesystems in the tree that do such advances things as inode writeback clustering for more than ten years :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists