linux-kernel - [BUG RT] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5071 2.6.23-rc1-rt7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1186290816.636.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:13:36 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: [BUG RT] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5071 2.6.23-rc1-rt7

Ingo,

The below ifndef, shouldn't that be ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS ?
I hit that warning while I was running !PREEMPT_RT but with both hard
and softiqs as threads.


int __sched cond_resched_softirq(void)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
	WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_softirq());
#endif
	if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
		local_bh_enable();
		__cond_resched();
		local_bh_disable();
		return 1;
	}
	return 0;
}


-- Steve

P.S. I really found out that the system becomes VERY non-responsive when
you run with both hard and softirqs as threads, but with
PREEMPT_NONE ;-)



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/