[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B6840B.8080006@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:14:35 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: david@...g.hm
CC: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frank Kingswood <frank@...gswood-consulting.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans
for 2.6.23]
david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
>
>> On 07/29/2007 01:41 PM, david@...g.hm wrote:
>>
>>> I agree that tinkering with the core VM code should not be done
>>> lightly,
>>> but this has been put through the proper process and is stalled with no
>>> hints on how to move forward.
>>
>>
>> It has not. Concerns that were raised (by specifically Nick Piggin)
>> weren't being addressed.
>
>
> I may have missed them, but what I saw from him weren't specific issues,
> but instead a nebulous 'something better may come along later'
Something better, ie. the problems with page reclaim being fixed.
Why is that nebulous?
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists