| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:36:45 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated) On Mon 2007-08-06 13:15:17, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Well, so that it does not bitrot? This is few bytes, I'd say, and I > > believe we have too many config options already. > > This is not an option the user is ever going to see. I think I'd > prefer Ok, option that users can't set is probably not evil. > having two new per-ARCH config symbols though: > config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE > depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE > > and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend. Looks like a plan. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists