linux-kernel - Re: high system cpu load during intense disk i/o

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46B747C7.9040409@gmx.net>
Date:	Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:09:43 +0200
From:	Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@....net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: high system cpu load during intense disk i/o

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:03:12 +0300 Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@....net> wrote:
> 
>> was my report so complicated?
> 
> We're bad.
> 
> Seems that your context switch rate when running two instances of
> badblocks against two different disks went batshit insane.  It doesn't
> happen here.

Hello again,

I run some more tests and figured out that the problem occurs only when 
the I/O is writing to disk. Indeed, when I run two badblocks without the 
-w switch, read-only that is, the oprofile output seems normal 
(two_discs_read.txt). So does the vmstat output:


procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- 
----cpu----
  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy 
id wa
  4  2      0  24136  87124  95660    0    0 28288     0  449  724 92  8 
  0  0
  4  2      0  24076  87136  95648    0    0 28160    12  446  749 91  9 
  0  0
  4  2      0  24016  87144  95664    0    0 28096    88  444  790 89 11 
  0  0
  4  2      0  24016  87144  95664    0    0 28288     0  444  705 88 12 
  0  0
  4  2      0  24016  87144  95660    0    0 28288     0  448  737 95  5 
  0  0

As you can see the context switching rate is greater now but the system 
CPU load much less, than that of two_discs_bad.txt.

However the cron jobs still seem to have a hard time finishing, even 
though they seem now to consume about 90% CPU time. Could someone please 
explain me some things that seem vital to understanding the situation?

Firstly, what is that "processor" line in the oprofile output without 
symbols? And why does *it* take all the CPU and not other important 
processes? Finally what do the kernel symbols "__switch_to" and 
"schedule" represent?


Thanks in advance,
Dimitris

View attachment "two_discs_read.txt" of type "text/plain" (12261 bytes)