[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070806155919.GA21066@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:59:19 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, J??rn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de,
dgc@....com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com,
richard@....demon.co.uk, david@...g.hm
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:39:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > btw., Mutt does not go boom, i use it myself. It works just fine
> > > and notices new mails even on a noatime,nodiratime filesystem.
> >
> > It still fails miserably for me.
> >
> > If I hit 'C' and '?' I get a list of my mail folders, with some of
> > them marked 'N' if they have new mail. Without atime, those N's never
> > show up and every mbox looks like it has no new mail.
>
> does it work with the "atime on steroids" patch below? (no need to
> configure anything, just apply the patch and go.)
people have reported that relatime does work, but my util-linux
isn't new enough to support it, so I've never got it to work.
I'll give your diff a try later, though as it seems to be
equivalent I expect it'll work.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists