[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708061209230.7603@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Steve Dickson <SteveD@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Shudder. That can just be a desaster for NUMA. Both performance wise
> > > and logic wise. One cpuset being low on memory should not affect
> > > applications in other cpusets.
>
> Do note that these are only PF_MEMALLOC allocations that will break the
> cpuset. And one can argue that these are not application allocation but
> system allocations.
This is global, global locking etc etc. On a large NUMA system this will
cause significant delays. One fears that a livelock may result.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists