[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708061215.16427.phillips@phunq.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:15:16 -0700
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Steve Dickson <SteveD@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
On Monday 06 August 2007 11:51, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On Monday 06 August 2007 11:42, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > > Currently your system likely would have died here, so ending up
> > > > with a reserve page temporarily on the wrong node is already an
> > > > improvement.
> > >
> > > The system would have died? Why?
> >
> > Because a block device may have deadlocked here, leaving the system
> > unable to clean dirty memory, or unable to load executables over
> > the network for example.
>
> So this is a locking problem that has not been taken care of?
A deadlock problem that we used to call memory recursion deadlock, aka:
somebody in the vm writeout path needs to allocate memory, but there is
no memory, so vm writeout stops forever.
Regards,
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists