[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <JMDAGF$E41775B89CFE6CA59D87D92B60DD7A0B@xandmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:36:15 +0200
From: "Jean-Baptiste Vignaud" <vignaud@...dmail.fr>
To: "mingo" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "cebbert" <cebbert@...hat.com>,
"marcin\.slusarz" <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
"jarkao2" <jarkao2@...pl>, "tglx" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"shemminger" <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-net" <linux-net@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"alan" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time
> * Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Before, they would print:
> >
> > eth0: transmit timed out, tx_status 00 status e601.
> > diagnostics: net 0ccc media 8880 dma 0000003a fifo 0000
> > eth0: Interrupt posted but not delivered -- IRQ blocked by another device?
> > Flags; bus-master 1, dirty 295757(13) current 295757(13)
> > Transmit list 00000000 vs. f7150a20.
> > 0: @f7150200 length 80000070 status 0c010070
> > 1: @f71502a0 length 80000070 status 0c010070
> > 2: @f7150340 length 8000005c status 0c01005c
> >
> > Now they just work, apparently...
>
> could you please try the patch below? If this doesnt do the trick then i
> guess we need to revert that change.
I confirm that the latest fedora kernel 2.6.22.1-41.fc7 (with the removal of [PATCH] genirq: do not mask interrupts by default) still work on my machine for 3 days.
Atm I'm still stressing the network (2 * 3com cards + 1 onboard nvidia card) to be sure.
Jb
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists