lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:31:49 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, Lee.Schermerhorn@...com,
	clameter@....com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Apply memory policies to top two highest zones when highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE


> If correct, I would suggest merging the horrible hack for .23 then taking
> it out when we merge "grouping pages by mobility".  But what if we don't do
> that merge?

Or disable ZONE_MOVABLE until it is usable? I don't think we have the
infrastructure to really use it anyways, so it shouldn't make too much difference
in terms of features. And it's not that there is some sort of deadline
around for it. 

Or mark it CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL with a warning that it'll break NUMA. But disabling 
is probably better.

Then for .24 or .25 a better solution can be developed.

I would prefer that instead of merging bandaid horrible hacks -- they have
a tendency to stay around.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ