linux-kernel - Re: What archs need flush_tlb_page() in handle_pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1186382262.938.35.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:37:42 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Arch list <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: What archs need flush_tlb_page() in handle_pte_fault() ?

On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:37 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Heya !
> 
> In my page table accessor spring cleaning, one of my targets is
> flush_tlb_page(). At this stage, it's only called by generic code in one
> place (in addition to the asm-generic bits that use it to implement
> missing accessors, but I'm taking care of those spearately) :

 .../...

No reply, so I suppose I can rip it out ? :-)

Thus any reason why that patch wouln't fly ? (not for 2.6.23 of course)

This removes the last occurence of flush_tlb_page() from generic code,
thus making this hook now optional for architectures that don't use
the helpers in asm-generic/pgtable.h

I couldn't find a case where this is actually needed, but I may well
have missed something. If I did though, please tell me what. If an
architecture need that call for obscure reason, it could be simply
folded in that architecture's implementation ptep_set_access_flags().

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
---

Index: linux-work/mm/memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-work.orig/mm/memory.c	2007-08-06 16:32:12.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-work/mm/memory.c	2007-08-06 16:34:07.000000000 +1000
@@ -2609,15 +2609,6 @@ static inline int handle_pte_fault(struc
 	if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, address, pte, entry, write_access)) {
 		update_mmu_cache(vma, address, entry);
 		lazy_mmu_prot_update(entry);
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * This is needed only for protection faults but the arch code
-		 * is not yet telling us if this is a protection fault or not.
-		 * This still avoids useless tlb flushes for .text page faults
-		 * with threads.
-		 */
-		if (write_access)
-			flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
 	}
 unlock:
 	pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/