[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <46B7A22D.4030909@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:35:25 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Olaf Hering <olh@...e.de>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22.y] ieee1394: revert "sbp2: enforce 32bit DMA mapping"
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 16:25 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
>>> Anyway. For now I will simply go with what 2.6.23-rc has and what
>>> 2.6.21 had: No dma_set_mask anywhere in the 1394 subsystem. We can
>>> revisit this whenever an actual need arises.
>> Not sure this is a very good idea. This seems rather likely to fail on
>> x86_64 machines with >4GB of RAM for example..
>
> Would it ? Isn't the default DMA mask for PCI devices set to 32 bits
> anyway ? In which case, swiotlb will take care of the matter.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
Hmm, that's true, yes. Suppose it shouldn't be a problem then.
I would agree, though, that sbp2 isn't really the place for setting
this, since the DMA mask is presently a property of the device, not of
the user..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists