linux-kernel - Re: about modularization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:45:39 +0200
From:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To:	Mitchell Erblich <erblichs@...thlink.net>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"T. J. Brumfield" <enderandrew@...il.com>
Subject: Re: about modularization

On 08/07/2007 01:35 AM, Rene Herman wrote:

> On 08/06/2007 11:48 PM, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
> 
>> Of the uni-processor systems currently that can run Linux, I would not 
>> doubt if 99.9999% percent are uni-cores.
> 
> s/can// and I would. s/uni-processor// additionally and I'd assure you 
> it's untrue. s/uni-cores/non-smt uni-cores/ and I'd do the same.

(no, that's obviously wrong given embedded volumes, but as stated below, 
embedded is fine running non-generic, !CONFIG_SMP kernels).

Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/