linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -rt 4/9] ifdef raise_softirq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070806072052.GG5359@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:20:52 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt 4/9] ifdef raise_softirq_irqoff wakeup


* Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 11:27 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > @@ -508,7 +508,9 @@ inline fastcall void raise_softirq_irqof
> > >  {
> > >  	__do_raise_softirq_irqoff(nr);
> > >  
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS
> > >  	wakeup_softirqd(nr);
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > thanks, applied. People rarely run the -rt kernel just to turn off 
> > PREEMPT_RT, that's why this bug was there ;-)
> 
> Ultimately, all modes should function correctly right?

yes, of course - especially once any of the components nears upstream 
integration ;-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/