[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708061013540.1735@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:21:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Nathan Williams <ngwilliams@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MODULE_LICENSE usage
On Aug 6 2007 17:53, Nathan Williams wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm working on a driver for an ADSL modem which requires the use of a
>binary library from the chipset manufacturer. All my source code is
>GPL, [...]
>I've given permission for the binary library file to be used with the GPL
>source code and be re-distributed with it.
>
>Is it correct to say that my driver is licensed under GPL with
>additional rights to use the binary library file?
[ Obligatory IANAL sticker. ]
Clear case for me IMHO. If your code is GPL (and which you emphasize
with MODULE_LICENSE(GPL)) and then link in a binary blob, then the
combined work becomes GPL, and you are required to hand out sources for
it, including for the blob.
I won't mention the gray possibilities because it is just evil in the
first place to begin with.
>Additionally, I'm unsure of what is the meaning of
>
>"GPL and additional rights" [GNU Public License v2 rights and more]
I think (but I may be wrong) that e.g. "GPL+BSD" fall into this. (Which
not change the fact that you are still obliged to comply with the GPL.)
>
>Thank you,
>Nathan
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists