[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708071243.52430.jimis@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:43:51 +0300
From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@....net>
To: Rafał Bilski <rafalbilski@...eria.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: high system cpu load during intense disk i/o
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 12:03:28 Rafał Bilski wrote:
> >> Just tested (plain curiosity).
> >> via82cxxx average result @533MHz:
> >> /dev/hda:
> >> Timing cached reads: 232 MB in 2.00 seconds = 115.93 MB/sec
> >> Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.12 seconds = 20.54 MB/sec
> >> pata_via average result @533MHz:
> >> /dev/sda:
> >> Timing cached reads: 234 MB in 2.01 seconds = 116.27 MB/sec
> >> Timing buffered disk reads: 82 MB in 3.05 seconds = 26.92 MB/sec
> >
> > Interesting! I haven't tried libata myself on that system, I only have
> > remote access to it so I'm a bit afraid...
>
> Just change root=/dev/hda1 to append="root=/dev/sda1" in lilo.conf.
> And change fstab. If You don't change "/" then system will go into single
> user mode after reboot.
>
> > Rafal, I hope that system you run hdparm on isn't the archlinux one! Is
> > it easy to load an old kernel (even two years old) and do the same test?
> > If it is, please let me know of the results.
>
> I don't think it is possible. If I remember right kernel can't be older
> then glibc kernel headers.
> Btw. My disk is 20GB 2,5" ATA33. I wonder how 26MB/s is possible. I don't
> expect more.
Aha! So perhaps libata gives even greater performance benefit for better
drives. I'll try to get local access to my PC and try it. Thanks.
Dimitris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists