[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070807141030.1bb0f76a@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:10:30 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: "Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: "Javier Pello" <javier.pello@...c.es>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] request_firmware: skip timeout if userspace was not
notified
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:46:55 +0200,
"Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote:
> > - Use an extra parameter in which successful delivery can be indicated.
> > Make this
> > int kobject_uevent_env_check(struct kobject *kobject,
> > enum kobject_action action,
> > char *envp[], int delivered);
> > so existing callers that don't care don't have to be changed.
>
> How do you check if events have been "handled"? None of the recent
> distros uses /sbin/hotplug anymore. Netlink events are broadcasted,
> but no failure in delivery doesn't mean anything like "handled", or
> delivered to the right instance. Even if you check that the netlink
> socket has listeners, that wouldn't be sufficient to tell that is is
> handled.
You can't check if it's been handled, yes; but you can certainly check
if you delivered it. I guess Javier wants to exclude the cases where
userspace didn't have any chance to handle it.
Javier: Do you have an idea how common the case "we broadcasted, but
nobody listened so we got a timeout" is? If the usual reason for the
timeout is that firmware was requested before a listener showed up, I'm
not sure whether that check is worth it...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists