[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070806162823P.tomof@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 22:58:24 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: James.Bottomley@...elEye.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.23-rc2
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:14:29 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:55:41 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com> wrote:
>
> > The real root cause of all of this is that there's no tree I can
> > persuade all the interested parties to test that includes all of these
> > features. In spite of the fact they've all been incubating in -mm for
> > at least 3 months, no-one apparently tested all the features together
> > until 2.6.23-rc1 was released, so then we're scrambling to address the
> > issues as they arise.
>
> I pulled git-scsi-misc on July 19 and there was no bsg code in there at
> all. I pulled again on July 20 and all the bsg code was in mainline. So
> it appears that the bsg code went mailing-list -> mainline in less than 24
> hours, so there wasn't a lot of opportunity for -mm testing there.
bsg was merged via Jens' branch. After that, I asked James to send
some fixes via the scsi-rc-fixes.
> A lot of the stupid it-doesn't-compile stuff would have been fixed in -mm,
> but more substantial problems might not have been picked up. But one can
> say that about anything.
My mistake. I should have sent bsg to -mm. Sorry about that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists