linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] request_firmware: skip timeout if userspace was not notified

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46B87ACA.7010501@urjc.es>
Date:	Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:59:38 +0200
From:	Javier Pello <javier.pello@...c.es>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
CC:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] request_firmware: skip timeout if userspace was not 
	notified

On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:

> If you don't have modules and the initial request fails, how do you
> load the firmware later?

I trigger a rebinding of the device to the driver in an init file:
# echo -n [device] >/sys/.../bind

> The real fix would be to change the driver not to block in the
> firmware request and use async version of firmware loading. The
> whole firmware class with its silly timeout is just a piece of
> crap, that needs to be replaced.

I don't think that would be a real fix. You've done away with the
kernel blocking, but the timeout is still there, only that in the
background, and my point is still true: it is useless to wait at
all if userspace didn't receive the event. Waiting asynchronously
is less annoying than waiting synchronously, but equally useless.

Javier


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/