lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B88A75.3040004@opengridcomputing.com>
Date:	Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:06:29 -0500
From:	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
CC:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	OpenFabrics General <general@...ts.openfabrics.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from the host TCP
 port space.



Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi Steve.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:37:41AM -0500, Steve Wise (swise@...ngridcomputing.com) wrote:
>> +static int cma_get_tcp_port(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct socket *sock;
>> +
>> +	ret = sock_create_kern(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP, &sock);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +	ret = sock->ops->bind(sock,
>> +			  (struct socketaddr 
>> *)&id_priv->id.route.addr.src_addr,
>> +			  ip_addr_size(&id_priv->id.route.addr.src_addr));
> 
> If get away from talks about broken offloading, this one will result in
> the case, when usual network dataflow can enter private rdma land, i.e.
> after bind succeeded this socket is accessible via any other network
> device. Is it inteded?
> And this is quite noticeble overhead per rdma connection, btw.
> 

I'm not sure I understand your question?  What do you mean by 
"accessible"?  The intention is to _just_ reserve the addr/port.  
The socket struct alloc and bind was a simple way to do this.  I 
assume we'll have to come up with a better way though.  
Namely provide a low level interface to the port space allocator 
allowing both rdma and the host tcp stack to share the space without
requiring a socket struct for rdma connections. 

Or maybe we'll come up a different and better solution to this issue...

Steve.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ