linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.23-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708062059030.5037@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.23-rc2

On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> Confused ... you did get the first pull request in the first week.

Here's the problem. Let me repeat it again:

> > And after -rc1, I don't want to see crap like this:
> > 
> > 	 46 files changed, 2837 insertions(+), 2050 deletions(-)

It DOES NOT MATTER if I get a first pull request in the first week, if 
that pull request is purely cosmetic, and is followed by stuff that 
*should* have been in the merge window four weeks afterwards.

> OK ... that's arguable.

There's nothing arguable at all about it.

If you have 5000 lines of changes, that's not a "bugfix" any more. That's 
a big damn change, and it should have happened in the merge window. Or if 
it doesn't make it in time, in the *next* merge window.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/