lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708070504.l7754KIr004277@bongo.freakout.de>
Date:	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 07:04:20 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Axel Reinhold <axel@...akout.de>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
CC:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Axel Reinhold <axel@...akout.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Bug in 2.4.35 when compiled gcc>=4.2.0 and
 -march=c3

According to Willy Tarreau:
> > >Well, top-level assembly is usually nasty.  Setting the section in the
> > >assembly statement as you said is probably the only thing you *can* do.
> > 

I do not understand the details of the discussion, but isn't the
fact, that there is more than one way for the compiler to produce
"correct" code of the nasty statements, also a "timebomb" for
other projects - especially for Linux 2.6?

Axel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ