[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708070504.l7754KIr004277@bongo.freakout.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 07:04:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Axel Reinhold <axel@...akout.de>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
CC: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Axel Reinhold <axel@...akout.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Bug in 2.4.35 when compiled gcc>=4.2.0 and
-march=c3
According to Willy Tarreau:
> > >Well, top-level assembly is usually nasty. Setting the section in the
> > >assembly statement as you said is probably the only thing you *can* do.
> >
I do not understand the details of the discussion, but isn't the
fact, that there is more than one way for the compiler to produce
"correct" code of the nasty statements, also a "timebomb" for
other projects - especially for Linux 2.6?
Axel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists