[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830708071325s4a633effj6fca2c79d734ece1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:25:26 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: "Dhaval Giani" <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Srivatsa Vaddagiri" <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Circular Locking Dependency Chain detected in containers code
On 8/7/07, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
>
> The typical annotation would be using spin_lock_nested/mutex_lock_nested
> with a non-0 nesting level for this one case.
>
OK, I'll look into this when I get back from vacation.
Thanks,
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists