[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070806221252.aa1e9048.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:12:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: mel@...net.ie (Mel Gorman)
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, clameter@....com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Apply memory policies to top two highest zones when
highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:55:41 +0100 mel@...net.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote:
> On (06/08/07 22:31), Andi Kleen didst pronounce:
> >
> > > If correct, I would suggest merging the horrible hack for .23 then taking
> > > it out when we merge "grouping pages by mobility". But what if we don't do
> > > that merge?
> >
> > Or disable ZONE_MOVABLE until it is usable?
>
> It's usable now. The issue with policies only occurs if the user specifies
> kernelcore= or movablecore= on the command-line. Your language suggests
> that you believe policies are not applied when ZONE_MOVABLE is configured
> at build-time.
So.. the problem which we're fixing here is only present when someone
use kernelcore=. This is in fact an argument for _not_ merging the
horrible-hack.
How commonly do we expect people to specify kernelcore=? If "not much" then
it isn't worth adding the __alloc_pages() overhead?
(It's a pretty darn small overhead, I must say)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists