[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B8E227.1010300@tmr.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:20:39 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Claudio Martins <ctpm@....utl.pt>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de,
dgc@....com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com,
richard@....demon.co.uk, david@...g.hm
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
Claudio Martins wrote:
> On Saturday 04 August 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Linux has never been a "suprise your kernel interfaces all just changed
>> today" kernel, nor a "gosh you upgraded and didn't notice your backups
>> broke" kernel.
>>
>
> Can you give examples of backup solutions that rely on atime being updated?
> I can understand backup tools using mtime/ctime for incremental backups (like
> tar + Amanda, etc), but I'm having trouble figuring out why someone would
> want to use atime for that.
>
Programs which migrate unused files or delete them are the usual cases.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists