[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708072336030.26397@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 23:37:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, bunk@...sta.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [2.6.22.2 review 09/84] Fix rfkill IRQ flags.
On Aug 7 2007 13:43, Greg KH wrote:
>
>added this 64-bit bug:
>
> ....
> unsigned int flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&task->lock, flags);
> ....
>
>irq 'flags' must be unsigned long, not unsigned int. The -rt tree has
>strict checks about this on 64-bit so this triggered a build failure.
Since the check is a compile-time one, would not it be good to add
it to the regular linux tree too?
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists