linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] msleep() with hrtimers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708080115020.1817@scrub.home>
Date:	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 01:16:49 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msleep() with hrtimers

Hi,

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> I'd be surprised if there was significant overhead - the maximum frequency
> at which msleep() can be called is 1000Hz.  We'd need an awful lot of
> overhead for that to cause problems, surely?
> 
> <thinks he's missing something again>

_Anybody_ has yet to answer what's wrong with adding a nanosleep() and 
using that instead.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/