[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:09:47 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: "Muli Ben-Yehuda" <muli@...ibm.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>, riku.seppala@...p.net,
"Andy Whitcroft" <apw@...dowen.org>,
"Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT] finish i386 and x86-64 sysdata conversion
On 8/7/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> Strongly agreed. It overall fixes bugs that existing _before_ the
> sysdata stuff went in.
what are those bugs?
the sysdata stuff try to fix:
when calgary iommu code was introduced, it is trying to share sysdata
that orginally is initialized k8_bus.c and used by pcibus_to_node. but
that only happen with AMD K8 platform. and have nothing to do with
calgary.
Then my patch get_mp_bus_to_node_as_early will use that sysdata as
node as early as possible before the pci_scan bus is called.
then Mul came out his patch ...to split the sharing that will never happen.
But andi picked muli patch even my patch stay a while in -mm.
Also i don't think anyone test muli sysdata patch with amd64 platform
with acpi=off. even muli himself.
calgary support bus numa at this time? i mean mult peer root bus on
different node..
anyway I will produce my patch in v3...
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists