[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:14:52 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <glommer@...il.com>
Cc: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <gcosta@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mingo@...e.hu, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
jeremy@...p.org, avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, lguest@...abs.org,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/25] [PATCH] irq_flags / halt routines
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 16:10:28 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> > > +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> > > +# ifdef CONFIG_X86_VSMP
> > > +static inline int raw_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
> > > +{
> > > + return !(flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF) || (flags & X86_EFLAGS_AC);
> > > +}
> > > +# else
> > > +static inline int raw_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
> > > +{
> > > + return !(flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF);
> > > +}
> > > +# endif
> >
> > You should really turn the vsmp special case into a paravirt client first
> > instead of complicating all this even more.
>
> By "client" you mean a user of the paravirt interface?
Yes
>
> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> > > +#define raw_safe_halt native_raw_safe_halt
> > > +#define halt native_halt
> > > +#endif /* ! CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
> >
> > This seems inconsistent
> Sorry andi. Can't see why. Could you elaborate?
Hmm, must have misread it. It's ok
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists