[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:23:44 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: "huang ying" <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Chandramouli Narayanan" <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3: EFI document
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 17:11:54 huang ying wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> > > Instead, elilo collects the needed information
> > > defined in include/asm-x86_64/bootsetup.h itself,
> >
> > That's nasty. I must have missed when we declared this a public ABI.
> > It's not really designed to be one. Was there public discussion on this?
>
> Maybe What I said is not clear and correct. In fact, the elilo follows
> the boot protocol defined in Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt,
No that's not the boot protocol. The boot protocol is in Documentation/i386/boot.txt
> just
> not uses arch/(i386|x86_64)/boot/setup.S to collect the information,
> but collects them by elilo itself. Information in
> include/asm-x86_64/bootsetup.h is just a part of that in
> Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt.
That's an internal interface that is not really suitable to use
by other programs. e.g. it is not extensible (unlike the boot protocol)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists