[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708091429.35075.hjk@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:29:34 +0200
From: Hans-Jürgen Koch <hjk@...utronix.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] UIO: Documentation
Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 01:40 schrieb Alan Cox:
> > On the other hand, given that we've always said that closed-source stuff in
> > userspace is OK, the only way to not let *that* horse out of the barn is to
> > not merge UIO at all.
>
> It really makes no difference whether it is merged or not. The test is
> "derivative work" and not 'linking'.
>
> A user space driver that is unusuable without a specific GPL kernel chunk
> is quite likely to be a derived work of the GPL kernel module
I disagree. UIO is a documented kernel<->userspace interface, like sysfs
or proc. Using your argument, we would also have to say that a userspace
software that is unusable without sysfs is a derived work of the kernel.
But IANAL, tell me if I missed an important point.
> so the
> documentation is giving poor advice however
I guess you mean this sentence:
"if you need to keep some parts of your driver closed source, you can do so
without violating the GPL license on the kernel."
What would you write instead?
Thanks,
Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists