[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46BB4E26.6010007@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:25:58 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
Etienne Lorrain <etienne_lorrain@...oo.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64 EFI support -v3: EFI document
Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Ah i didn't realize this. Ok then kexec is also quite broken.
> Somehow this must have been missed this fundamental flaw when this code was
> reviewed.
>
It wasn't missed. It was given the "there is no other way" defence, and
somehow that was considered sufficient.
Now, one could argue that kexec can just pass the boot_params from the
previous kernel boot, except there is no way to read them out, and so
it's not how it actually works.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists