[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21381.1186683681@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:21:21 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org,
steved@...hat.com, trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> > + u32 (*inode_get_secid)(struct inode *inode);
>
> To maintain API consistency, please return an int which only acts as an
> error code, and returning the secid via a *u32 function parameter.
Does that apply to *all* the functions, irrespective of whether or not they
return an error?
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists