[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070809101105.GA7581@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:11:05 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Ed L. Cashin" <ecashin@...aid.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ak@...e.de,
Netdev list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ATA over ethernet swapping
Hi!
> I've been working on this for quite some time. And should post again
> soon. Please see the patches:
>
> http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/vm_deadlock/current/
>
> For now it requires one uses SLUB, I hope that SLAB will go away (will
> save me the trouble of adding support) and I guess I ought to do SLOB
> some time (if that does stay).
>
> You'd need the first 22 patches of that series, and then call
> sk_set_memalloc(sk) on the proper socket, and do some fiddling with the
> reconnect logic. See nfs-swapfile.patch for examples.
What do you use for testing? I set up ata over ethernet... swapping
over that should deadlock w/o your patches.
But I'm able to compile kernel (-j 10) on 128MB machine, and I tried
cat /dev/zero | grep foo to exhaust memory... and could not reproduce
the deadlock. Should I pingflood? Tweak down ammount of atomic memory
avaialable to make deadlocks easier to reproduce?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists