lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9452870655b1844283961f8e9e406464@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:23:47 +0200
From:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc:	wjiang@...ilience.com, rpjday@...dspring.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ak@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	jesper.juhl@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, zlynx@....org,
	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/24] document volatile atomic_read() behavior

>> Anyway, what's the supposed advantage of *(volatile *) vs. using
>> a real volatile object?  That you can access that same object in
>> a non-volatile way?
>
> That's my understanding.  That way accesses where you don't care about 
> volatility may be optimised.

But those accesses might be done non-atomically then (for example,
if the compiler knows it only needs to write one byte, it might not
bother writing the rest), so that's no good if you want to read the
thing atomically too.

> For instance, in cases where there are already other things 
> controlling visibility (as are needed for atomic increment, for 
> example) you don't need to make the access itself volatile.

Hrm, you mean within a lock or similar?  You'll get the same semantics
as volatile anyway there.


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ