[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708081949320.9909@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, miklos@...redi.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de, dgc@....com,
tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com,
richard@....demon.co.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> On 8/4/07, david@...g.hm <david@...g.hm> wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
> At least on a surface level, your report has some similarities to
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/21/84 . In that message, John Miller
> mentions several things he tried without effect:
>
> < - I increased the max allowed receive buffer through
> < proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max and the application calls the right
> < syscall. "netstat -su" does not show any "packet receive errors".
mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# cat rmem_*
124928
131071
mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# netstat -su
Udp:
697853177 packets received
10025642 packets to unknown port received.
191726680 packet receive errors
63194 packets sent
RcvbufErrors: 191726680
UdpLite:
mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# echo "512000" >rmem_max
> < - After getting "kernel: swapper: page allocation failure.
> < order:0, mode:0x20", I increased /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes
I have not seen any similar errors
> < - ixgb.txt in kernel network documentation suggests to increase
> < net.core.netdev_max_backlog to 300000. This did not help.
mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# cat netdev_*
300
1000
mercury1:/proc/sys/net/core# echo "300000" >netdev_max_backlog
> < - I also had to increase net.core.optmem_max, because the default
> < value was too small for 700 multicast groups.
I'm not running multicast.
> As they're all pretty simple to test, it may be worthwhile to give
> them a shot just to rule things out.
unfortunantly the load is not high enough right now to see a real
difference (it's only doing ~1400 logs/sec) I'll catch it at a higher load
point to see if these make any difference.
David Lang
> Ray
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists