[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070810005517.5c336be1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:55:17 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>, josh@...edesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1: sleeping function called from invalid context
at kernel/mutex.c:86
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:40:00 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > We seem to have made a mess in there. timer_list_show() ends up
> > calling lookup_module_symbol_name(), which takes a mutex. However
> > print_symbol() (which is called at oops time, interrupt time, etc)
> > calls module_address_lookup(), which is basically the same, only it
> > doesn't take the mutex.
>
> hm, current upstream does:
>
> static void print_name_offset(struct seq_file *m, void *sym)
> {
> char symname[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
>
> if (lookup_symbol_name((unsigned long)sym, symname) < 0)
>
> why was that changed?
It wasn't. lookup_symbol_name() calls lookup_module_symbol_name() which
calls mutex_lock().
> I think symbol lookups for debug purposes have to
> be lockless, fundamentally.
>
Sure, especially a sysrq thingy.
It's a bit nasty to just go in there and start walking data structures
without holding the needed lock though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists