linux-kernel - Re: mmc: ignore bad max block size in sdhci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070810153457.57369903@poseidon.drzeus.cx>
Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:34:57 +0200
From:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmc: ignore bad max block size in sdhci

On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:25:03 +0100
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com> wrote:

> mmc: ignore bad max block size in sdhci
> 
> Some SDHC cards report an invalid maximum block size, in these cases
> assume they support block sizes up to 512 bytes instead of returning
> an error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>

Thanks. Applied.

I find it rather amusing that this is for a controller from a vendor
that brags about its conformance testing kits. Go figure.

-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/