lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708091843230.3185@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>
cc:	Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Embed zone_id information within the zonelist->zones
 pointer


On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:

> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT > ZONES_SHIFT
> > 
> > Is this necessary? ZONES_SHIFT is always <= 2 so it will work with 
> > any pointer. Why disable this for UP?
> > 
> 
> Caution in case the number of zones increases. There was no guarantee of
> zone alignment. It's the same reason I have a BUG_ON in the encode
> function so that if we don't catch problems at compile-time, it'll go
> BANG in a nice predictable fashion.

Caution would lead to a BUG_ON but why the #if? Why exclude UP?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ