[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070809.184921.11594412.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org, adobriyan@...ru,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] sysctl: Fix neighbour table sysctls.
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:47:10 +0900 (JST)
> I disagree. It is bad to remove existing interface.
> Ditto for other patches.
I think perhaps you misunderstand what Eric is doing.
sys_sysctl() isn't working properly for these cases and it is both a
deprecated interface and not worth the pain of adding support
in these cases.
The fact that nobody complains that none of this stuff works
via sys_sysctl() to me proves that it is never used.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists