[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070809190623.f60dcf70.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:06:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Josh Triplett <josh@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1: rcutorture xtime usage
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:00:40 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:31:46AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:51:06AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >...
> > > Changes since 2.6.23-rc2-mm1:
> > >...
> > > +allow-rcutorture-to-handle-synchronize_sched.patch
> > >...
> > > 2.6.23 queue
> > >...
> >
> > All drivers were converted to no longer use xtime directly since it
> > might be quite outdated, but this patch adds a usage of xtime.tv_nsec
> > as RNG...
>
> This code doesn't care if the time is outdated, as it is simply
> periodically perturbing an RNG, but OK.
>
> So, what interface are we supposed to be using instead? I cannot use
> get_random_bytes() due to locking issues. This is not a cryptographically
> secure usage, so the perturbation does not need to be extremely high
> quality.
>
> On x86, I would just grab the low-order bits of the TSC, but all of the
> world is not an x86. ;-)
>
One used to use sched_clock() for this, then get frowned at. Now we
have cpu_clock()...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists