[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A0224C71C@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:53:03 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "David Mosberger-Tang" <dmosberger@...il.com>
Cc: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<Zoltan.Menyhart@...l.net>, <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte() on ia64 take9 [2/2] flush icache at set_pte
> What about code-size?
text data bss dec hex filename
9499911 911620 1313065 11724596 b2e734 vmlinux-before
text data bss dec hex filename
9504047 911620 1313065 11728732 b2f75c vmlinux-after
So about 4K extra. In the kernel I built (tiger_defconfig) there
are 27 call-sites for __ia64_sync_icache_dcache ... so that amounts
to about 150 bytes each ... or close to 10 bundles.
> Also, is it OK to call a function from all places where a set_pte() is
> being done? I'd hope so, but it's a really low-level operation...
These are all from normal-looking C code ... so RSE must be valid.
What other weird things might be be doing that would make it a
problem for the new code to make a function call?
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists