[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A0224C777@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:19:29 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Chris Snook" <csnook@...hat.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <ak@...e.de>,
<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
<horms@...ge.net.au>, <wjiang@...ilience.com>,
<cfriesen@...tel.com>, <zlynx@....org>, <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
<jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on ia64
> That's distressing. I'm about to resubmit with a volatile cast in
> atomic_set as well, since people expect that behavior and I've been
> shown a legitimate case where it could matter. Does the assembly look
> right with that cast in atomic_set() as well?
No. With the casts to volatile in atomic_set and atomic64_set I
still see places where ld8 is changed to ld4 + sign-extend.
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists