lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A0224C777@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:19:29 -0700
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	"Chris Snook" <csnook@...hat.com>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <ak@...e.de>,
	<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
	<horms@...ge.net.au>, <wjiang@...ilience.com>,
	<cfriesen@...tel.com>, <zlynx@....org>, <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	<jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on ia64

> That's distressing.  I'm about to resubmit with a volatile cast in 
> atomic_set as well, since people expect that behavior and I've been 
> shown a legitimate case where it could matter.  Does the assembly look 
> right with that cast in atomic_set() as well?

No.  With the casts to volatile in atomic_set and atomic64_set I
still see places where ld8 is changed to ld4 + sign-extend.

-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ