[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708101607130.30176@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
cc: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
wjiang@...ilience.com, cfriesen@...tel.com, zlynx@....org,
rpjday@...dspring.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on ia64
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Luck, Tony wrote:
>
> Here are the functions in which they occur in the object file. You
> may have to chase down some inlining to find the function that
> actually uses atomic_*().
Could you just make the "atomic_read()" and "atomic_set()" functions be
inline functions instead?
That way you get nice compiler warnings when you pass the wrong kind of
object around. So
static void atomic_set(atomic_t *p, int value)
{
*(volatile int *)&p->value = value;
}
static int atomic_read(atomic_t *p)
{
return *(volatile int *)&p->value;
}
etc...
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists