[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46BCF458.7010300@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:27:20 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Hans-Jürgen Koch <hjk@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Documentation files in html format?
On 08/10/2007 10:12 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> What primary requirements does in-tree Linux kernel documentation have
>> to fulfill in general?
>
> Skipping the obvious ones such as correct, up-to-date etc.
> o Readable as-is
> o Grepable
> o buildable as structured documents or almost like a single book
> o Easy to replicate structure
> o Maintainable in any decent text-editor (emacs, vim, whatever)
Easy to put online?
> Asciidoc is quite close to plaintext and it looks to me that the
> formatting possibilities are quite good.
>
> I spend an hour experimenting a little with
> Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt.
>
> Diff below shows quite a lot of changes but for the most
> this is removal of the indent tab.
> Most likely I could have tweaked asciidoc to accept this
> but wanted to use default config.
>
> The resulting html page can be seen here:
> http://www.ravnborg.org/kbuild/makefiles.html
FWIW, this looks very good to me...
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists